“Side effects” of the Internet Revolution
Note: I originally published this synopsis to my website on December 2002 as part of a review of Webcredibility. (See http://www.nodvin.net/nodvin/webcredibility/ ). I am now teaching a seminar course on Critical Thinking and I decided to repost the original writing to this blog.
It is true that almost anyone can put up a web site even one that looks “informativeâ€. However the unsuspecting viewer may not think question the purpose behind a professionally looking website which contains a lot of apparently relevant information. Doing a Google search on the words “side effectsâ€, turns up as one of the top hits: Zoloft Side Effects Lawyer - suicide, withdrawal, agitation, aggression, hostility. This is the title embedded in the HTML code of the Zoloft Side Effects Lawyer website. The keywords embedded in the HTML are: zoloft, zoloft side effects, ssri, antidepressant, sertraline, side effects of zoloft, zoloft withdrawal, zoloft information, antidepressant side effects,zoloft withdrawal symptom, zoloft effects, zoloft lawsuit, zoloft antidepressant, zoloft sertraline, zoloft lawyer, zoloft attorney.
So it is a good bet that someone using almost any search engine for information on side effects of Zoloft and other antidepressants will hit upon this site.
The group, Consumer WebWatch, has proposed the following guidelines regarding Web credibility:
|
CONSUMER We believe Web sites will promote Web credibility if they adopt these basic policies: We believe Web sites will promote Web credibility if they adopt these basic policies:
1 Identity: 2 Advertising and Sponsorships: 3 Customer Service: 4 Corrections: 5 Privacy: *** We believe Web site readers should be able to find these policies easily, on an “About Us” or “Site Center” page navigable from the home and other site pages. |
The Zoloft Side Effects Lawyer website brakes many of these guidelines. While the word “lawyer†should be a giveaway in the title and URL, there is no “About Us†or disclosure page. The address given at the bottom of the home page and a URL (no link) on the “contact†page do indeed lead to the law firm: Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo. An advertisement under the “Practice Areas†page of the law firm’s website states: “Antidepressant Product Liability Cases: Since 1988, Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford & Schiavo has represented victims in drug product liability litigation against pharmaceutical companies arising out of the use of potentially harmful drugs that may cause serious injury or deathâ€.
The Zoloft Side Effects Lawyer website states “Zoloft causes some people (3-5%) to experience a suicidal eventâ€. This is based upon the several studies from the early 1990s on the potential effects of ssri antidepressants in enhancing suicide ideation. But of course the website fails to cite more recent studies and reports including the following web report: Suicidal and violent behavior associated with the use of fluoxetine, published by Dr. James D. Hegarty who wrote the report for the Drugs and Devices Information Line at the Harvard School of Public Health. Dr. Hegarty concludes this web report by stating: “In conclusion, the available evidence supports only an equivalent or decreased risk for emergent SI or aggression during fluoxetine therapy as compared to other antidepressant medicationsâ€.
Not only does the Zoloft Side Effects Lawyer website not cite Dr. Hegarty’s report but it only selectively cites reports showing “bad†side effects of this medication. While numerous scary sounding side-effects are pronounced on the site there is no mention of the fact that the FDA labeling for the drug puts things in perspective:
|
Suicide - |
Misinformation has always been a part of society. As a way of making a profit and of promulgating certain views, I am sure that it has been used endlessly. The World Wide Web provides an easy conduit for misinformation. However those utilizing the Web also have access to authoritative
information sites. In the pre-Internet days, lay persons receiving misinformation via available media (print, radio, television, etc.) did not have easy access to more reliable sources. With a good
understanding of the limitations and benefits of this new web medium, including a recognition of best practice uses as proposed by groups such as Consumer WebWatch, web using consumers have the opportunity to make informed choices in evaluating the information and misinformation pervasive in our
society.
Stephen C.Nodvin
December 2002